|
Home | Jesus Visits Britain | Arian Creed | St Simon Zelotes | St Joseph of Arimathea | Reference |
||||
|
Questions...
|
Answers...
|
Surprised? This is all well-documented history. History that very few of us have ever heard. Why? For the same reason that many of us were never taught about the massacre of the Arian Christians in the 4th century who were a larger following than those of the Church in Rome. People write history to suit themselves. We’ll see this again and again as the history of the English church unfolds. We’re victims of the Greco-Roman version of history. They wanted people to believe that they were the most important ones on the stage of history, and called everyone else barbarians. Well, that just isn’t so.
This first section is taken from Lionel Smithett Lewis’ St. Joseph of Arimathea at Glastonbury:
“It is certain that Britain received the Faith in the first age from the first sewers of the Word. Of all the churches whose origin I have investigated in Britain, the church of Glastonbury is the most ancient.”
Wrote sir Henry Spelman in his Concilia, and again he wrote in the same work:
“We have abundant evidence that this Britain of ours received the Faith, and that from the disciple of Christ Himself, soon after the Crucifixion of Christ.”
Robert Parsons, the Jesuit, in his Three Conversions of England, admits that:
“The Christian religion began in Britain within fifty years of Christ’s ascension.”
His co-religionist, the very learned Alford, in his Regia Fides says:
“It is perfectly certain that, before St. Paul had come to Rome, Aristobulus was absent in Britain.”
The discreet Fuller goes so far as to say:
“If credit be given to these ancient authors, this Church without competition was senior to all Christian churches in the world.”
Wrote the erudite Polydore Vergil:
“Britain, partly through Joseph of Arimathea, partly through Fugatus and Damianus, was of all kingdoms the first that received the Gospel.”
It is a matter of distinct interest, which we commend to modern Roman Catholics, that Cardinal Pole, twice over, when solemnly reconciling England to the Pope and the Church of Rome, at the beginning of Queen Mary’s reign, claimed that Britain was the first country to be converted to Christianity.
The Venerable Bede, writing about 740 AD, says:
“The Britons preserved the Faith which they had received under King Lucius uncorrupted, and continued in peace and tranquillity until the time of the Emperor Diocletian.”
It will be noticed that two distinct events are spoken of above:
(1) The foundation of the Church in England by the Disciples of Christ.
(2) The acceptance of Christianity by the British Nation under Good King Lucius about 170 AD.
Britain was the first of all nations to accept Christianity
as its national religion. Few people realize that this is why the British
King is called “our Most Religious King”. Not many realize that
the superior dignity and antiquity of the British national Church has been decided
by Church Synods and Councils (though heretical for other reasons): the
Synod of Pisa in 1409, Council of Constance in 1417, Synod of Sienna in 1424, and
the Council of Basel in 1434. It was there contended that the
Churches of France and Spain must yield in points of antiquity and
precedence to that of Britain, as the latter Church was founded by Joseph
of Arimathea immediately after the Passion of Christ.
St Gildas the Wise (c. 494 or 516 – c. 570), the earliest Celtic Christian historian and clergyman distinctly says that the Light of Christ shone here in the last year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, that is 37 AD. This falls in with the claim recorded above, which gave precedence to British Bishops at the Church Councils on the ground that Britain was converted “Immediately after the Passion of Jesus Christ”. It fits in also with the statements of Fuller and Polydore Virgil already recorded that the Church of Glastonbury was the Senior Church of the world; with Sir Henry Spelman’s words that Britain received the Faith soon after the Crucifixion; with Alford’s statement that Aristobulus was in Britain before St. Paul went to Rome; with the observance by the Greek Church of the martyrdom in Britain of Our Lord’s disciple, St. Simon Zelotes, on 10th May 44 A.D. (a date supported by Cardinal Baronius; and with Hippolytus’ (born about 160 AD) inclusion of that Apostle in his lists as “Bishop of the Britons”. All these are testimony to the year 37 AD as marking the coming of the first Mission and not to the date 63 AD.

Next
we go to The Drama of The Lost Disciples, by George F. Jowett for
some background on the journey and makeup of the party headed up by Joseph
of Arimathea.
Ancient documents carefully preserved, and others recently recovered from
dusty, long-forgotten archives referring to that epochal year, record him
[Joseph] as having been cast upon the seas with a few faithful companions
by their remorseless enemies, in an open, oarless boat without sails, on
an ebbing tide over which they drifted far from the shores of their
shadowed Judean homeland, to which they would never return. The only man
who the Sadducees dared not oppose was Joseph, the great uncle of Jesus, known
scripturally and in secular history as Joseph of Arimathea. He was the
protector of that valorous little band of disciples during the perilous
years following the crucifixion, the indefatigable head of the Christian
underground in Judea, and the guardian of Christ’s only earthly treasure,
Jesus’ mother. In actuality, Joseph of Arimathea was the Apostle of
Britain, the true Apostle first to set up Christ’s standard on the
sea-girt little isle, five hundred and sixty-two years before St.
Augustine set foot on English soil. He, with twelve other disciples of
Christ, erected in England the first Christian church above ground in the
world, to the glory of God and His Son, Jesus Christ.
Joseph of Arimathea was a man of refinement, well educated, and one who
possessed many talents. He had extraordinary political and business
ability and was reputed to be one of the wealthiest men in the world of
that time. He was the Carnegie of his day, a metal magnate controlling the
tin and lead industry which then was akin in importance to that of steel
today. He is reputed to have owned one of the largest private merchant
shipping fleets afloat which traversed the world’s sea lanes in the
transportation of this precious metal. In St. Jerome’s translation,
Joseph’s official title is given as “Nobilis Decurio”. This would indicate
that he held a prominent position in the Roman administration as a
minister of mines.
According to the Talmud, Joseph was the younger brother of the father of
Mary the mother of Jesus. He was her uncle, and therefore a great uncle to Jesus.
Chiefly from the secular reports we learn that Joseph was a married man
and his son, Josephes, left a mark of distinction in British history. It
is quite obvious that the husband of Mary died while Jesus was young.
Under Jewish law such a circumstance automatically appointed the next male
kin of the husband, in this case Joseph, legal guardian of the family. We
know that Joseph never forsook his nephew. He stood by Him as a bold,
fearless defender at the notorious trial, and defied the Sanhedrin by
going to Pilate and boldly claiming the body when all others feared to do
so. It is commonly taught that Jesus was poor and of obscure relatives.
His relationship with the affluent Joseph of Arimathea proves otherwise.
In His own right He was a property owner but long before He took up His
mission He forsook all material wealth.

Legends of Glastonbury
Rev. C.C. Dobson
gave us some historical background of both the tin trade in Britain and Jesus’ relationship with
Joseph of Arimathea.
Herodotus as early as 445 BC speaks of the British Isles as the Tin
Islands or Cassiterides. Pytheas (352-323 BC) mentions the tin trade, as
does also Polybius (circa 160). Diodorus Siculus gives a detailed
description of the trade. He tells us that the tin was mined, beaten into
squares, and carried to an island called Ictis, joined to the mainland at
low tide, which is generally held to be Mount St. Michael in Cornwall,
although some have identified it with Falmouth. Thence it was shipped to
Morlais, and transported across France on pack horses to Marseilles. From
Marseilles it was again shipped to Phoenicia. Innumerable ancient workings
in Cornwall still attest the trade, and tin is still mined there today.
Lord Avebury and Sir John Evans held the opinion that the trade existed as
early as 1500 BC, and Sir Edward Creasy in his History of England writes: “The British mines mainly
supplied the glorious adornment of
Solomon’s
Temple”.
Joseph of Arimathea was an uncle of Mary
the mother of Jesus, being the younger
brother of her father. He gained his wealth as an importer in the tin
trade, which existed between Cornwall and Phoenicia. It is postulated that
on one of his voyages
he took Jesus with him when a boy. Hence the legend that the young Jesus
visited Glastonbury in Britain returning to Israel later as a young man.
According to the legend he erected for himself a small house of mud and
wattle; later Joseph of Arimathea, fleeing from Palestine, settles in the same
place and erected a mud and wattle church there.
| Tradition holds that Joseph’s mud and wattle church
was replaced with Lady Chapel. The only writing to survive the abbey’s destruction is located in the wall of Lady Chapel. |
|

You may find The Traditions of Glastonbury and a very nice video tape showing the locations around Cornwall at Mr. E. Raymond Capt’s website, www.artisanpublishers.com .
St. Joseph of Arimathea at Glastonbury, Lionel Smithett
Lewis (Glastonbury Vicar), ISBN 0-227-67868-0 Publisher, James Clarke
& Co Ltd, Cambridge, England.
The Origin and Early History of Christianity in Britain, Andrew Gray, ISBN
0-934666-43-1, Artisan Sales - - http://www.artisanpublishers.com
The New Testament Apochrypha
Pseudo-Pauline Apocrypha: Acts 29, and
Psuedo-Apostolic (Nicodemus) Apocrypha: The Acts / Gospel of Nicodemus.
Note: While
this article brings to light some interesting and valuable evidence,
particularly concerning the arrival of early Christianity into Britain, it is
intended to stimulate interest and debate on the subject of early Christianity
in Britain. The legend of Jesus’ visits to Britain does NOT form part of Arian
Catholic doctrine!
[(XP) Primus Inter Pares.]
www.holy-catholic.org
www.arian.org.uk
| www.arian-catholic.org
www.holy-catholic.org.uk | www.arian-catholic.org.uk
enquiries
holy-catholic.org
© 2005-6 Rev. Dr. B.B.M.J. Mackenzie-Hanson, B.A. (Hons), D.D., a.c.O.S.B.
![]()